The penny is worthless because of inflationary spending by our government.
Story here
It's worthless because we inflate our money causing it to be worth - less.
The fact that it costs more "money" to make a penny than what it's currently worth is a symptom, not the cause.
Dishonest governments love coin clipping, it's been going on for 2,000-3,000 years, nothing new here. Steal from the population via inflation, then raise taxes, then confiscate the real money (gold/silver), etc.... nothing new here.
Monday, February 18, 2013
Sunday, January 6, 2013
This is why high capacity magazines should be required, not banned
I'm a revolver fan, but you should be using a caliber with enough power so below does not happen.
OR, use a semi-automatic with a 20 round magazine, so you can keep firing.
Sounds to me like the husband in this case did a great job, keeping a loaded weapon available and making sure his wife knew where is was and how to use it correctly.
Three lives saved in one incident in one day. I wonder how many other lives were save in this one day by using firearms. You'll never see this data in the so called media.
Story here: The BOLD highlights are mine.
The incident happened at a home on Henderson Ridge Lane in Loganville around 1 p.m. The woman was working in an upstairs office when she spotted a strange man outside a window, according to Walton County Sheriff Joe Chapman. He said she took her 9-year-old twins to a crawlspace before the man broke in using a crowbar.
But the man eventually found the family.
"The perpetrator opens that door. Of course, at that time he's staring at her, her two children and a .38 revolver," Chapman told Channel 2’s Kerry Kavanaugh.
The woman then shot him five times, but he survived, Chapman said. He said the woman ran out of bullets but threatened to shoot the intruder if he moved.
"She's standing over him, and she realizes she's fired all six rounds. And the guy's telling her to quit shooting," Chapman said.
The woman ran to a neighbor's home with her children. The intruder attempted to flee in his car but crashed into a wooded area and collapsed in a nearby driveway, Chapman said.
Deputies arrested 32-year-old Atlanta resident Paul Slater in connection with the crime. Chapman said they found him on the ground saying, "Help me. I'm close to dying." Slater was taken to Gwinnett Medical Center for treatment. Chapman said Slater was shot in the face and neck.
In February, Slater was arrested on simple battery charges, according to the Gwinnett County Sheriff's Office. He has been arrested six other times in the county since 2008.
Kavanaugh was the first reporter at the scene as deputies investigated. The victim's husband told Kavanaugh he's proud of his wife. He was on the phone with her as the intruder broke in.
"My wife is a hero. She protected her kids. She did what she was supposed to do as responsible, prepared gun owner," Donnie Herman said.
He said he's thankful for his family's safety.
"Her life is saved, and her kids' life is saved, and that's all I'd like to say," Herman said.
Channel 2’s Amy Napier Viteri learned from Chapman late Friday night that slater has been placed on a ventilator and suffers from punctured lungs, a punctured liver and a punctured stomach.
He said if Slater survives the night, doctors will try to operate in the morning to repair the damage.
Chapman said Slater has four exit wounds.
Slater is currently being charged with burglary.
OR, use a semi-automatic with a 20 round magazine, so you can keep firing.
Sounds to me like the husband in this case did a great job, keeping a loaded weapon available and making sure his wife knew where is was and how to use it correctly.
Three lives saved in one incident in one day. I wonder how many other lives were save in this one day by using firearms. You'll never see this data in the so called media.
Story here: The BOLD highlights are mine.
LOGANVILLE, Ga. —
A woman hiding in her attic with children shot an intruder multiple times before fleeing to safety Friday.The incident happened at a home on Henderson Ridge Lane in Loganville around 1 p.m. The woman was working in an upstairs office when she spotted a strange man outside a window, according to Walton County Sheriff Joe Chapman. He said she took her 9-year-old twins to a crawlspace before the man broke in using a crowbar.
But the man eventually found the family.
"The perpetrator opens that door. Of course, at that time he's staring at her, her two children and a .38 revolver," Chapman told Channel 2’s Kerry Kavanaugh.
The woman then shot him five times, but he survived, Chapman said. He said the woman ran out of bullets but threatened to shoot the intruder if he moved.
"She's standing over him, and she realizes she's fired all six rounds. And the guy's telling her to quit shooting," Chapman said.
The woman ran to a neighbor's home with her children. The intruder attempted to flee in his car but crashed into a wooded area and collapsed in a nearby driveway, Chapman said.
Deputies arrested 32-year-old Atlanta resident Paul Slater in connection with the crime. Chapman said they found him on the ground saying, "Help me. I'm close to dying." Slater was taken to Gwinnett Medical Center for treatment. Chapman said Slater was shot in the face and neck.
In February, Slater was arrested on simple battery charges, according to the Gwinnett County Sheriff's Office. He has been arrested six other times in the county since 2008.
Kavanaugh was the first reporter at the scene as deputies investigated. The victim's husband told Kavanaugh he's proud of his wife. He was on the phone with her as the intruder broke in.
"My wife is a hero. She protected her kids. She did what she was supposed to do as responsible, prepared gun owner," Donnie Herman said.
He said he's thankful for his family's safety.
"Her life is saved, and her kids' life is saved, and that's all I'd like to say," Herman said.
Channel 2’s Amy Napier Viteri learned from Chapman late Friday night that slater has been placed on a ventilator and suffers from punctured lungs, a punctured liver and a punctured stomach.
He said if Slater survives the night, doctors will try to operate in the morning to repair the damage.
Chapman said Slater has four exit wounds.
Slater is currently being charged with burglary.
Saturday, January 5, 2013
So you still think the "middle" class was exempt from this tax "deal"?
Here's what I've been saying, someone making $30,000, their taxes will raise more proportionally than someone making between $200,000 and $500,000.
In other words, never believe what a politician says, believe only what they do.
Congressman Bill Johnson said in this statement on 1/2/13: "Now that an agreement has been reached to prevent going over the fiscal cliff and permanently cut taxes on 99 percent of the American people"
He's playing fast and loose with facts and using George Orwell speak to confuse us.
The real number is 80% of all taxpayers will pay more taxes, due to his vote.
In 2001 the "Bush" tax cuts went into effect.
This, so called, fiscal cliff deal merely extended or made permanent the tax cuts that took effect in 2001, with the exception of those making more the $400,000/yr.
So, his vote did not cut any taxes, it did the exact opposite. This "deal" raised the social security payroll taxes by 2% of one's income. So if you make $50,000 a year, you'll pay an additional $1000.
Yet, this Congressman tries to have us believe that tax bill he voted for only raised taxes on those with income above $400,000 and "cut taxes on 99% of the American people"!!!
Bottom line is Bill Johnson's vote did this:
In other words, never believe what a politician says, believe only what they do.
Congressman Bill Johnson said in this statement on 1/2/13: "Now that an agreement has been reached to prevent going over the fiscal cliff and permanently cut taxes on 99 percent of the American people"
He's playing fast and loose with facts and using George Orwell speak to confuse us.
The real number is 80% of all taxpayers will pay more taxes, due to his vote.
In 2001 the "Bush" tax cuts went into effect.
This, so called, fiscal cliff deal merely extended or made permanent the tax cuts that took effect in 2001, with the exception of those making more the $400,000/yr.
So, his vote did not cut any taxes, it did the exact opposite. This "deal" raised the social security payroll taxes by 2% of one's income. So if you make $50,000 a year, you'll pay an additional $1000.
Yet, this Congressman tries to have us believe that tax bill he voted for only raised taxes on those with income above $400,000 and "cut taxes on 99% of the American people"!!!
Bottom line is Bill Johnson's vote did this:
- made permanent (as permanent as things are in Washington) the tax rates that have been in effect since 2001
- That is with the exception of those making over $400,000, their rates went up.
- Raised social security tax (on everyone) an additional 2%
- The net result of this joke of an unneeded bill and all the fake hystericals around it, is this. One making $30k/yr ends up paying more taxes proportionally than one making 200k - 500k.
- Raised the death tax rate to 40%. So a son who inherits his father's farming operation has to pay an additional 5% tax(this is on top of the original 35%), just to keep the farm in the family. We've got a real joke of a government It's sickening to think of all the local government officials smirking with anticipation when they hear about a local wealthy individual on their death beds.....wondering what their cut will be.
Thursday, January 3, 2013
Representative Bill Johnson plays George Orwell
He can try to spin (lie, wiggle, reword, rephrase, distort, etc, etc..) about his vote, but the fact is he voted to raise taxes on every working person in his district.
His words in his latest "press" release: "permanently cut taxes on 99 percent of the American people" Um, we just received a 2% tax increase on our payroll taxes thanks to this bill he voted for.
How does this jive with his claim that he cut taxes for 99% of Americans? It doesn't.
Again, He claims he voted to "permanently cut taxes on 99 percent of the American people". How can that be? The rates stayed the same for some and went up for others and went down for no one. How is this a tax cut?
"Bill Johnson Votes to Protect Middle Class Families"
"Washington has a spending problem that threatens the prosperity of our children and grandchildren. Now that an agreement has been reached to prevent going over the fiscal cliff and permanently cut taxes on 99 percent of the American people, the table has been cleared to tackle the out-of-control federal spending that has amassed a $16 trillion national debt head-on."
"As we start a new year, it is critically important for the President and Senate to work together with the House on the big issues that are driving our debt and stifling job creation. We must strengthen and preserve Medicare, overhaul Medicaid and completely reform our tax code. We owe it to our children and grandchildren to solve our fiscal challenges now so that they may have the same access to the American Dream that our generation has been blessed with."
His words in his latest "press" release: "permanently cut taxes on 99 percent of the American people" Um, we just received a 2% tax increase on our payroll taxes thanks to this bill he voted for.
How does this jive with his claim that he cut taxes for 99% of Americans? It doesn't.
Again, He claims he voted to "permanently cut taxes on 99 percent of the American people". How can that be? The rates stayed the same for some and went up for others and went down for no one. How is this a tax cut?
"Bill Johnson Votes to Protect Middle Class Families"
Washington,
Jan 2 -
Congressman Bill Johnson (R-Marietta)
released the following statement after voting in favor of the Senate’s
proposed agreement to avert the fiscal cliff."Washington has a spending problem that threatens the prosperity of our children and grandchildren. Now that an agreement has been reached to prevent going over the fiscal cliff and permanently cut taxes on 99 percent of the American people, the table has been cleared to tackle the out-of-control federal spending that has amassed a $16 trillion national debt head-on."
"As we start a new year, it is critically important for the President and Senate to work together with the House on the big issues that are driving our debt and stifling job creation. We must strengthen and preserve Medicare, overhaul Medicaid and completely reform our tax code. We owe it to our children and grandchildren to solve our fiscal challenges now so that they may have the same access to the American Dream that our generation has been blessed with."
Wednesday, January 2, 2013
Can someone tell me why I should vote for Bill Johsnon again?
Congressman Bill Johnson votes for this joke of a bill.
Raising taxes with no spending cuts. Un-freaking-believable! And I voted for this clown! Not again. I'm getting tired of the false choice of picking between the worst of two evils.
The problem is, they didn't even need his vote to pass this. He voted for it anyway! This tells me that he really thinks reducing our deficit can be done by increasing spending. Where do we get these geniuses?
I expected quasi counterfeiter Steve Stivers to support this, as he thinks we can clip our coins and save money when making money. An ancient and fraudulant money watering down scheme that he supports and leads. Typical big government republican thinking, BTW.
However, Bill Johnson sells himself as a "conservative". If this is being a conservative, I'd hate to see what a socialist looks like.
It's time to purge the republican party of these pretenders. If that doesn't happen, it's time to purge the republican party altogether.
This is from Johnson's own house website:
Jobs & The Economy
".....Our government is building a national debt at a rate that we can’t afford – we’re leaving our children and grandchildren with a bill for which they shouldn’t be responsible. The first step is to balance the budget.....and hold spending in line in order to bring down the national debt.
We must create wealth, not distribute it. And we must reduce taxes. Today’s Federal tax code penalizes the wealthy and incentivizes the poor to subsist on entitlement programs. Reducing taxes at all levels of income will stimulate the economy both from the top down (allowing more investment in business and job creation) and from the bottom up (giving people more purchasing power)."
It's not what he says that's important, it's what he does and how he votes that matters.
So he, like many other GOP members, talk tough in campaign mode, but when it comes to casting principled, tough votes, he caves. The tough talk quoted above, about reducing taxes, becomes a whimpering yes vote to raise taxes.
SICKENING!
Link Here
WASHINGTON — Ohio’s congressional delegation voted with the majority to pass the agreement that avoided the so-called fiscal cliff of middle-class tax increases and spending cuts. All five House Democrats from Ohio voted in favor as the measure passed 257-167 Tuesday night. Ohio’s House Republicans split, six voting in favor and seven against. Those voting in favor were Democrats Marcia Fudge, Marcy Kaptur, Dennis Kucinich, Tim Ryan and Betty Sutton, and Republicans John Boehner, Bill Johnson, Steve LaTourette, Robert Latta, Steve Stivers, and Pat Tiberi. Those voting against were Republicans Steve Austria, Steve Chabot, Bob Gibbs, Jim Jordan, Jim Renacci, Jean Schmidt and Michael Turner.
Raising taxes with no spending cuts. Un-freaking-believable! And I voted for this clown! Not again. I'm getting tired of the false choice of picking between the worst of two evils.
The problem is, they didn't even need his vote to pass this. He voted for it anyway! This tells me that he really thinks reducing our deficit can be done by increasing spending. Where do we get these geniuses?
I expected quasi counterfeiter Steve Stivers to support this, as he thinks we can clip our coins and save money when making money. An ancient and fraudulant money watering down scheme that he supports and leads. Typical big government republican thinking, BTW.
However, Bill Johnson sells himself as a "conservative". If this is being a conservative, I'd hate to see what a socialist looks like.
It's time to purge the republican party of these pretenders. If that doesn't happen, it's time to purge the republican party altogether.
This is from Johnson's own house website:
Jobs & The Economy
".....Our government is building a national debt at a rate that we can’t afford – we’re leaving our children and grandchildren with a bill for which they shouldn’t be responsible. The first step is to balance the budget.....and hold spending in line in order to bring down the national debt.
We must create wealth, not distribute it. And we must reduce taxes. Today’s Federal tax code penalizes the wealthy and incentivizes the poor to subsist on entitlement programs. Reducing taxes at all levels of income will stimulate the economy both from the top down (allowing more investment in business and job creation) and from the bottom up (giving people more purchasing power)."
It's not what he says that's important, it's what he does and how he votes that matters.
So he, like many other GOP members, talk tough in campaign mode, but when it comes to casting principled, tough votes, he caves. The tough talk quoted above, about reducing taxes, becomes a whimpering yes vote to raise taxes.
SICKENING!
Link Here
WASHINGTON — Ohio’s congressional delegation voted with the majority to pass the agreement that avoided the so-called fiscal cliff of middle-class tax increases and spending cuts. All five House Democrats from Ohio voted in favor as the measure passed 257-167 Tuesday night. Ohio’s House Republicans split, six voting in favor and seven against. Those voting in favor were Democrats Marcia Fudge, Marcy Kaptur, Dennis Kucinich, Tim Ryan and Betty Sutton, and Republicans John Boehner, Bill Johnson, Steve LaTourette, Robert Latta, Steve Stivers, and Pat Tiberi. Those voting against were Republicans Steve Austria, Steve Chabot, Bob Gibbs, Jim Jordan, Jim Renacci, Jean Schmidt and Michael Turner.
Monday, December 31, 2012
Monday, December 17, 2012
Sunday, December 16, 2012
It's already illegal to have guns with 1,000 ft of a school
There is no need for additional gun laws. We have thousands of them already.
They just need enforced. taking more rights (Constitutional rights BTW) away from law abiding Citizens is not the answer.
It's already against the law to have a gun within 1,000 feet of a school.
If this one law (that's already on the books) would have been enforced, the latest nut job catastrophe would not have happened.
We need to put the crazies back in the mental hospitals.
They just need enforced. taking more rights (Constitutional rights BTW) away from law abiding Citizens is not the answer.
It's already against the law to have a gun within 1,000 feet of a school.
If this one law (that's already on the books) would have been enforced, the latest nut job catastrophe would not have happened.
We need to put the crazies back in the mental hospitals.
Thursday, December 6, 2012
Let the market work III
More dumb government. Why do Ohio lawmakers want to limit our access to precious metals?
Leave us alone, we can make our own decisions.
Not very often is there a reason to agree with a federal judge, but this is one.
He must not have received the memo that the people should be forced to use the funny money that the government prints.
Dispatch story here
COLUMBUS — A federal judge has ruled that an Ohio law aimed at curbing gold- and silver-related theft by barring precious-metals dealers from advertising without a license is unconstitutional.
U.S. District Judge Michael Watson in Columbus ordered the Ohio Department of Commerce late yesterday to stop enforcing the Precious Metals Dealers Act. The disputed law set a framework for regulating gold, silver and precious-metals dealers, including coin dealers.
The 1851 Center for Constitutional Law brought the suit on behalf of Liberty Coins of Delaware. It was threatened with closure for refusing to pay fines and obtain a license to advertise.
Watson said advertising your business classifies as speech protected by the First Amendment.
Commerce Director David Goodman urged consumers to be vigilant as the state considers its next step.
Leave us alone, we can make our own decisions.
Not very often is there a reason to agree with a federal judge, but this is one.
He must not have received the memo that the people should be forced to use the funny money that the government prints.
Dispatch story here
COLUMBUS — A federal judge has ruled that an Ohio law aimed at curbing gold- and silver-related theft by barring precious-metals dealers from advertising without a license is unconstitutional.
U.S. District Judge Michael Watson in Columbus ordered the Ohio Department of Commerce late yesterday to stop enforcing the Precious Metals Dealers Act. The disputed law set a framework for regulating gold, silver and precious-metals dealers, including coin dealers.
The 1851 Center for Constitutional Law brought the suit on behalf of Liberty Coins of Delaware. It was threatened with closure for refusing to pay fines and obtain a license to advertise.
Watson said advertising your business classifies as speech protected by the First Amendment.
Commerce Director David Goodman urged consumers to be vigilant as the state considers its next step.
Friday, November 23, 2012
Saturday, November 3, 2012
Let them raise gas prices, let the market work!
Of course we knew this was coming. Forced rationing for fuel purchases in New Jersey.
Not only is Gov. Christie a loud mouth idiot.............in other words, he's from New Jersey. He has shown his true socialist colors. Story here.
Big government does not work and I'm not sure why some "conservatives" are enamoured with this clown. Hes pro-abortion, anti-gun, and now when he had a chance to embrace the market, he turns to government for the answer....which is a fiasco.
Let them raise prices at the pumps. Rationing will not be needed. The lines will be reduced due to folks that don't really "need" fuel won't pay even slightly higher prices. We've all seen it, folks driving miles away to get gas for .01cent cheaper, these are the folks that will not pay higher gas prices. They might just stay home instead of driving around unneeded.
However, there would be fuel for those the really need it. This is not rocket science. What's really scarey is it doesn't take a Harvard Business School graduate to figure this out, however, there are many folks that don't want the market to work and want the government to "punish" anyone that uses the market...........(remember, it's the market that will keep supplies on hand through raising and lowering of pricing, depending on demand and the amount of supplies available.)
There are way too many socialist government types (Republican and Democrat) demagogues that will suck the wall of the fuel tanks in, then start an investigation of the private sector because supplies ran out.
Not only is Gov. Christie a loud mouth idiot.............in other words, he's from New Jersey. He has shown his true socialist colors. Story here.
Big government does not work and I'm not sure why some "conservatives" are enamoured with this clown. Hes pro-abortion, anti-gun, and now when he had a chance to embrace the market, he turns to government for the answer....which is a fiasco.
Let them raise prices at the pumps. Rationing will not be needed. The lines will be reduced due to folks that don't really "need" fuel won't pay even slightly higher prices. We've all seen it, folks driving miles away to get gas for .01cent cheaper, these are the folks that will not pay higher gas prices. They might just stay home instead of driving around unneeded.
However, there would be fuel for those the really need it. This is not rocket science. What's really scarey is it doesn't take a Harvard Business School graduate to figure this out, however, there are many folks that don't want the market to work and want the government to "punish" anyone that uses the market...........(remember, it's the market that will keep supplies on hand through raising and lowering of pricing, depending on demand and the amount of supplies available.)
There are way too many socialist government types (Republican and Democrat) demagogues that will suck the wall of the fuel tanks in, then start an investigation of the private sector because supplies ran out.
Thursday, October 18, 2012
Gas cans and the Federal government
Apparently it's been awhile since I purchased any new gas cans.
After the July seven day power outage, I decided to go out and buy a couple. I like to keep a few cans full of gas all the time, so when we do have issues, like power outages, I'm not stuck in a gas line.
What I found were cans with no vents and strange devices on the top that require two hands to operate. They also have no vent to allow the removed liquid to be replaced with air. This causes the gas to take 4 times as long to drain out of the can.
I figured that anything this stupid has government idiots finger prints all over it and it does. See this link: http://lfb.org/today/how-government-wrecked-the-gas-can/
Here's the solution, go to this website and purchase their product. It includes regular spouts that don't require 2 hands to operate and a vent. All you have to do it drill a 1/2" hole in the can and insert their vent. You need to use a wood drill bit to make a clean hole.
According to our gestopo type federal government, these folks are not allowed to sell these as gas can spouts and vents, so they are for "water" cans.
However, these spouts and vents work perfectly in gas cans and it's made of the same hydrocarbon resistant polymers that gas cans are made of. What a coincidence!
I've bought 3 packs and have used them on all different manufacturers of gas cans.
After the July seven day power outage, I decided to go out and buy a couple. I like to keep a few cans full of gas all the time, so when we do have issues, like power outages, I'm not stuck in a gas line.
What I found were cans with no vents and strange devices on the top that require two hands to operate. They also have no vent to allow the removed liquid to be replaced with air. This causes the gas to take 4 times as long to drain out of the can.
I figured that anything this stupid has government idiots finger prints all over it and it does. See this link: http://lfb.org/today/how-government-wrecked-the-gas-can/
Here's the solution, go to this website and purchase their product. It includes regular spouts that don't require 2 hands to operate and a vent. All you have to do it drill a 1/2" hole in the can and insert their vent. You need to use a wood drill bit to make a clean hole.
According to our gestopo type federal government, these folks are not allowed to sell these as gas can spouts and vents, so they are for "water" cans.
However, these spouts and vents work perfectly in gas cans and it's made of the same hydrocarbon resistant polymers that gas cans are made of. What a coincidence!
I've bought 3 packs and have used them on all different manufacturers of gas cans.
Monday, September 3, 2012
Friday, July 27, 2012
Athens County Commissioners
Looks to me like they are making good sense. Not sure why Sheriff Kelley doesn't understand that one just can't answer questions like this quickly.
Athens News Story
Here's a question for the Sheriff:
"Payne said that he has heard from some people who want the shooting range to be open to the public, perhaps at least just one day per month. There are no other public shooting range options in Athens County, and none since the range in question was closed last year.
Kelly responded, "That is not an option."
WHY NOT? The tax payers will be paying for this.
Athens News Story
Here's a question for the Sheriff:
"Payne said that he has heard from some people who want the shooting range to be open to the public, perhaps at least just one day per month. There are no other public shooting range options in Athens County, and none since the range in question was closed last year.
Kelly responded, "That is not an option."
WHY NOT? The tax payers will be paying for this.
Saturday, April 21, 2012
Engine Brakes and unintended consequences
Engine Brakes
I've noticed many locations lately with the sign stating "engine brake prohibited".
Why would communities want semi tractor trailers to be less safe in their neighborhood?
Engine brakes recirculated exhaust through the engine to help the truck slow down. Turning these off make the trucks rely on only their brake system to stop.
Turning these engine brakes off makes the trucks have less stopping power, hence less safe.
These signs show up in populated areas where there is increase traffic, making them needed even more.
This is another example of unintended consequences. People really need to think before they request their compliant government officials to do things that on the surface, might sound good.........reducing noise........but it really makes the highways less safe.
Many newer trucks have engine brakes that are so quiet, one can't even tell they are being used, but with the legal requirements, truck drivers turn them off to avoid citations.
This is another set of rules that one would hope is ignored.
If communities really want to impact noise, they need signage indicated "no loud motorcycles allowed". That would eliminate many times the noise than engine brakes and make the roads safer at the same time.
Parkersburg is the only municipality (that I know of) around that has stated publicly that they will not require engine brakes to be turned off, due to safety.
I've noticed many locations lately with the sign stating "engine brake prohibited".
Why would communities want semi tractor trailers to be less safe in their neighborhood?
Engine brakes recirculated exhaust through the engine to help the truck slow down. Turning these off make the trucks rely on only their brake system to stop.
Turning these engine brakes off makes the trucks have less stopping power, hence less safe.
These signs show up in populated areas where there is increase traffic, making them needed even more.
This is another example of unintended consequences. People really need to think before they request their compliant government officials to do things that on the surface, might sound good.........reducing noise........but it really makes the highways less safe.
Many newer trucks have engine brakes that are so quiet, one can't even tell they are being used, but with the legal requirements, truck drivers turn them off to avoid citations.
This is another set of rules that one would hope is ignored.
If communities really want to impact noise, they need signage indicated "no loud motorcycles allowed". That would eliminate many times the noise than engine brakes and make the roads safer at the same time.
Parkersburg is the only municipality (that I know of) around that has stated publicly that they will not require engine brakes to be turned off, due to safety.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Subscribe To
Posts
All Comments
